Chemically programmed STING-activating nano-liposomal vesicles improve anticancer immunity

The often immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) may hinder immune evasion and response to checkpoint blockade therapies. Pharmacological activation of the STING pathway does create an immunologically hot TME, however, systemic delivery might lead to undesired off-target inflammatory responses. Here, we generate a small panel of esterase-activatable pro-drugs based on the structure of the non-nucleotide STING agonist MSA-2 that are subsequently stably incorporated into a liposomal vesicle for intravenous administration. The pharmacokinetic properties and immune stimulatory capacity of pro-drugs delivered via liposomes (SAProsomes) are enhanced compared to the free drug form. By performing efficacy screening among the SAProsomes incorporating different pro-drugs in syngeneic mouse tumor models, we find that superior therapeutic performance relies on improved delivery to the desired tumor and lymphoid compartments. The best candidate, SAProsome-3, highly stimulates secretion of inflammatory cytokines and creates a tumoricidal immune landscape. Notably, upon application to breast cancer or melanoma mouse models, SAProsome-3 elicits durable remission of established tumors and postsurgical tumor-free survival while decreasing metastatic burden without significant systemic toxicity. In summary, our work establishes the proof of principle for a better targeted and more efficient and safe STING agonist therapy.


Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection Malvern Zetasizer Nano, UV-2600 spectrophotometer, IVIS Lumina LT Series III, Bruker 400 spectrometer, AB TripleTOF 5600 plus System, Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX LX, Beckman Coulter DxFLEX, Hitachi Chromaster 5000 system, NanoDrop one system, CFX96 Touch real-time system, ChemiDoc MP system Data analysis LX CytExpert 2.4, FlowJo 10 and Kaluza 2.1 was used for flow cytometry data analysis; NMR spectra were processed by Mestre Nova 14 and GraphPad Prism 8 were used for statistical analysis; The histological section images were analyzed using CaseViewer 2.4.
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data
Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of any restrictions on data availability -For clinical datasets or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to our policy All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Source data are provided with this paper.

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sample size
Sample size was chosen to ensure reproducibility of the experiments in accordance with the replacement, reduction and refinement principles of animal ethics regulation. Sample size are provided in the figure legends for each experiment and reasonable sample sizes were chosen to ensure they are sufficient for statistical comparison between different groups.
Data exclusions No data was excluded in this study.

Replication
Dara are presented as means and SD of at least 3 independent experiments. All experimental findings were reliably reproduced. All experiments were performed as technical or biological replications as appropriate for the experiment design. Details of experimental replicates are given in the figure legends.
Randomization All samples were randomly allocated into experimental groups.

Blinding
No blinding was used throughout experiments. The investigators should keep careful track of protocols because that most of the experiments needed multiple treatments (including formulation, cells or mouse tumor treatment, sample collection, and so on). Hence, it would be difficult to blind the investigators to group allocation during data collection and analysis.

Behavioural & social sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Study description
Briefly describe the study type including whether data are quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods (e.g. qualitative cross-sectional, quantitative experimental, mixed-methods case study).

Data collection
Provide details about the data collection procedure, including the instruments or devices used to record the data (e.g. pen and paper, computer, eye tracker, video or audio equipment) whether anyone was present besides the participant(s) and the researcher, and whether the researcher was blind to experimental condition and/or the study hypothesis during data collection.

nature portfolio | reporting summary
April 2023 Timing Indicate the start and stop dates of data collection. If there is a gap between collection periods, state the dates for each sample cohort.

Data exclusions
If no data were excluded from the analyses, state so OR if data were excluded, provide the exact number of exclusions and the rationale behind them, indicating whether exclusion criteria were pre-established.

Non-participation
State how many participants dropped out/declined participation and the reason(s) given OR provide response rate OR state that no participants dropped out/declined participation.

Randomization
If participants were not allocated into experimental groups, state so OR describe how participants were allocated to groups, and if allocation was not random, describe how covariates were controlled.

Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.

Sampling strategy
Note the sampling procedure. Describe the statistical methods that were used to predetermine sample size OR if no sample-size calculation was performed, describe how sample sizes were chosen and provide a rationale for why these sample sizes are sufficient.

Data collection
Describe the data collection procedure, including who recorded the data and how. Access & import/export Describe the efforts you have made to access habitats and to collect and import/export your samples in a responsible manner and in compliance with local, national and international laws, noting any permits that were obtained (give the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information).

Disturbance
Describe any disturbance caused by the study and how it was minimized.

Eukaryotic cell lines Policy information about cell lines and Sex and Gender in Research
Cell line source(s) The human monocyte cell line THP1 cells and LLC cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). B16-OVA cell line was purchased from Crisprbio (Beijing, China).

Authentication
These cell lines were morphologically confirmed.

Mycoplasma contamination
No mycoplasma contamination was found.

Commonly misidentified lines (See ICLAC register)
The used cell lines were not listed in commonly misidentified lines in ICLAC register.

Palaeontology and Archaeology Specimen provenance
Provide provenance information for specimens and describe permits that were obtained for the work (including the name of the issuing authority, the date of issue, and any identifying information). Permits should encompass collection and, where applicable, export.

Specimen deposition
Indicate where the specimens have been deposited to permit free access by other researchers.

Dating methods
If new dates are provided, describe how they were obtained (e.g. collection, storage, sample pretreatment and measurement), where they were obtained (i.e. lab name), the calibration program and the protocol for quality assurance OR state that no new dates are provided.
Tick this box to confirm that the raw and calibrated dates are available in the paper or in Supplementary Information.

nature portfolio | reporting summary
April 2023

Ethics oversight
Identify the organization(s) that approved or provided guidance on the study protocol, OR state that no ethical approval or guidance was required and explain why not.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Wild animals
No wild animals were involved in this study.

Reporting on sex
The sex was not considered in the study design because there was no direct correlation between the selected tumour model and sex.
Field-collected samples No field-collected samples were involved in this study.

Ethics oversight
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the National Institute Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Clinical data Policy information about clinical studies
All manuscripts should comply with the ICMJE guidelines for publication of clinical research and a completed CONSORT checklist must be included with all submissions.
Clinical trial registration Provide the trial registration number from ClinicalTrials.gov or an equivalent agency.

Study protocol
Note where the full trial protocol can be accessed OR if not available, explain why.

Data collection
Describe the settings and locales of data collection, noting the time periods of recruitment and data collection.

Outcomes
Describe how you pre-defined primary and secondary outcome measures and how you assessed these measures.

Dual use research of concern
Policy information about dual use research of concern Hazards Could the accidental, deliberate or reckless misuse of agents or technologies generated in the work, or the application of information presented in the manuscript, pose a threat to: Experiments of concern Does the work involve any of these experiments of concern: No Yes

ChIP-seq Data deposition
Confirm that both raw and final processed data have been deposited in a public database such as GEO.
Confirm that you have deposited or provided access to graph files (e.g. BED files) for the called peaks.

Data access links
May remain private before publication.
For "Initial submission" or "Revised version" documents, provide reviewer access links. For your "Final submission" document, provide a link to the deposited data.

Files in database submission
Provide a list of all files available in the database submission.
Genome browser session (e.g. UCSC) Provide a link to an anonymized genome browser session for "Initial submission" and "Revised version" documents only, to enable peer review. Write "no longer applicable" for "Final submission" documents.

Methodology Replicates
Describe the experimental replicates, specifying number, type and replicate agreement.

Sequencing depth
Describe the sequencing depth for each experiment, providing the total number of reads, uniquely mapped reads, length of reads and whether they were paired-or single-end.

Antibodies
Describe the antibodies used for the ChIP-seq experiments; as applicable, provide supplier name, catalog number, clone name, and lot number.
Peak calling parameters Specify the command line program and parameters used for read mapping and peak calling, including the ChIP, control and index files used.

Data quality
Describe the methods used to ensure data quality in full detail, including how many peaks are at FDR 5% and above 5-fold enrichment.

Software
Describe the software used to collect and analyze the ChIP-seq data. For custom code that has been deposited into a community repository, provide accession details.